The fear that seeking help will leave a record is legitimate and has real reasons behind it. A psychiatrist writes about physicians' silence and its price.
There is a question physicians ask quietly, usually near the end of the conversation, once they have decided they are going to ask it: “does this get recorded anywhere?”
The question usually arrives with an apology attached, as though it were petty to worry about that given what one is feeling. It is not. It is one of the most sensible questions anyone can ask.
In a recent survey of thousands of physicians, one obstetrician-gynaecologist wrote something that stayed with me: she said she hated her life, but that leaving was not an option, and neither was inpatient treatment — because it would make her unemployable.
It is easy to read that sentence as internalized stigma, as though she were inflating a fear that exists only in her head. I think it is worth considering another reading, a more uncomfortable one: she may simply be right about the consequences.
Perhaps you have already done this arithmetic. Or perhaps you know someone who postpones seeking help for reasons never said out loud.
Either way, I wanted to talk about this without pretending the fear is unfounded.
The silence has reasons, and they are real
The usual conversation about physicians who do not seek help tends to revolve around a culture of invulnerability, professional pride, difficulty stepping out of the role of the one who cares. All of that exists. But it explains only part.
When physicians are asked directly why they hide what they are feeling, the most frequent answer — across successive surveys — is not shame. It is the fear of having their professional competence called into question.
And that fear has an address. Many hospital credentialing and license renewal forms still ask whether the professional has ever been treated for a psychiatric condition. They do not ask whether he is fit now, which would be the only legitimate thing to ask. They ask about the entire past.
In other words: the stigma is not only in the culture, which changes slowly through conversation. It is printed on a document. And documents only change when someone rewrites them.
When a physician decides not to see anyone, he is not choosing between caring for himself and not caring for himself. He is choosing between a career risk that is concrete, documentable and immediate, and a health risk that is diffuse, distant and seems manageable. Framed that way, the arithmetic tilts toward silence. And it tilts for reasons any sensible person would recognize.
Which is why institutional programs help so little
When physicians were asked what their employer could most usefully do, only seven per cent pointed to support services or check-ins offered by the institution.
Seven per cent, in a population where almost half report exhaustion. This is not indifference to care. It is that a service offered by the same institution that handles credentialing does not solve the central problem — it concentrates it. Seeking help there means generating a record precisely where a record costs the most.
That is why awareness campaigns move this number so little. They ask for courage to face a risk that still exists after the campaign is over.
What silence charges later
Recognizing that the arithmetic is sensible is not the same as saying it comes cheap. And here there is something I think is important to say carefully, without alarm.
Older physicians report far more frequently an exhaustion that has already lasted more than two years, while younger ones are mostly at the beginning. What that describes is something that settles rather than passes. Time, in this matter, is rarely neutral.
And there is a cruel asymmetry in how the two risks are felt. The risk of seeking help feels immediate and controllable — you simply do not go. The risk of not seeking it feels distant and improbable. Yet it is the second that produces precisely the most feared scenario: the crisis-driven leave of absence, which is public, involuntary and infinitely more documentable than an appointment nobody needed to know had happened.
Silence protects up to the point where it stops protecting. And that point is not chosen by anyone.
What changes the arithmetic
Two things, on very different scales.
The first is slow and does not depend on any physician individually: as long as forms ask about a history of treatment rather than about current capacity to practice, the incentive toward silence remains standing. That belongs to medical boards, specialty societies, medical staff committees — and is worth saying out loud in those places.
The second is immediate, and may be what matters now: a private consultation, outside the employing structure, is not the same thing as an institutional program. It is worth being precise about the difference, because it tends to get lost when someone assesses, in general terms, whether “it is worth seeking help”.
A private consultation is protected by ordinary medical confidentiality, generates no communication to an employer, a medical staff office or any committee, and bears no relation to fitness-to-practice processes. What is discussed there stays there. This does not fix the structural problem, and it would be dishonest to suggest it does — but it substantially changes what is actually at risk in the decision to talk to someone.
If you have been postponing
I am not asking you to face down the fear. I am suggesting the fear may be aimed at the wrong target.
The more useful question is probably not “should I seek help despite the risk”. It is a more specific one: which risk exactly am I trying to avoid — and does the place I am considering actually produce it?
It is worth saying, finally, that one in five physicians in that same survey answered that they would not hide this from anyone. Not a majority. But it is a figure that did not exist with this clarity a few years ago, and it was built by people who did the arithmetic and reached a different conclusion.
You do not have to tell anyone. Perhaps only that you need not carry it alone.
Related reading
- The physician who becomes patient: when the narcissistic wound is the greater resistance
- Doctor: someone who loves you may have already noticed your pain
- When the physician is the one who needs help
Are you a physician afraid that asking for help will leave a record?
Book your appointment here
In-person appointments in Brasília (Asa Sul) or by teleconsultation anywhere in Brazil.
Dr. Leonardo Sodré is a psychiatrist and psychotherapist in Brasília, Brazil (CRM-DF 14.206 · RQE 14.761). He holds a PhD in Psychiatry from UFRGS and teaches at the University of Brasília School of Medicine. This content is informative and educational and does not replace individual assessment, diagnosis or treatment.